Balancing Between Privacy and Utility for Affect Recognition Using Multitask Learning in Differential Privacy–Added Federated Learning Settings: Quantitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The rise of wearable sensors marks a significant development in the era of affective computing. Their popularity is continuously increasing, and they have the potential to improve our understanding of human stress. A fundamental aspect within this domain is the ability to recognize perceived stress through these unobtrusive devices. Objective: This study aims to enhance the performance of emotion recognition using multitask learning (MTL), a technique extensively explored across various machine learning tasks, including affective computing. By leveraging the shared information among related tasks, we seek to augment the accuracy of emotion recognition while confronting the privacy threats inherent in the physiological data captured by these sensors. Methods: To address the privacy concerns associated with the sensitive data collected by wearable sensors, we proposed a novel framework that integrates differential privacy and federated learning approaches with MTL. This framework was designed to efficiently identify mental stress while preserving private identity information. Through this approach, we aimed to enhance the performance of emotion recognition tasks while preserving user privacy. Results: Comprehensive evaluations of our framework were conducted using 2 prominent public datasets. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in emotion recognition accuracy, achieving a rate of 90%. Furthermore, our approach effectively mitigates privacy risks, as evidenced by limiting reidentification accuracies to 47%. Conclusions: This study presents a promising approach to advancing emotion recognition capabilities while addressing privacy concerns in the context of empathetic sensors. By integrating MTL with differential privacy and federated learning, we have demonstrated the potential to achieve high levels of accuracy in emotion recognition while ensuring the protection of user privacy. This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to use affective computing in a privacy-aware and ethical manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".