Volume-Based Occupancy Detection for In-Cabin Applications by Millimeter Wave Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In-cabin occupancy detection has become increasingly important due to incidents involving children left in vehicles under extreme temperature conditions. Frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars are widely used for non-contact monitoring and sensing applications, particularly for occupancy detection. However, the confined and metallic environment inside vehicle cabins presents significant challenges due to multipath reflections. This paper introduces a novel approach that detects the occupied space in each seat to determine occupancy, using the variance of detected points as an indicator of volume occupancy. In an experimental study involving 70 different scenarios with single and multiple subjects, we classify occupants in each seat into one of three categories: adult, baby, or empty. The proposed method achieves an overall accuracy of 96.7% using an Adaboost classifier and a miss-detection rate of 1.8% for detecting babies. This approach demonstrates superior robustness to multipath interference compared to traditional energy-based methods, offering a significant advancement in in-cabin occupancy detection technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".