MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401790729 · doi:10.3389/freae.2024.1445765

Histone H2A variants play a key role at DNA double-strand breaks during repair pathway choice

2024· article· en· W4401790729 on OpenAlexafffund
Emile Clerf, Maxime Galloy, Amélie Fradet‐Turcotte, Jacques Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Epigenetics and Epigenomics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsHistoneDNA repairHistone H2ADouble strandDNAGeneticsBiologyCell biologyComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Histone post-translational modifications and variants play crucial roles in the adaptability of chromatin structure, facilitating rapid responses necessary for biological processes such as transcription, replication, and DNA damage signaling. Notably, DNA double-strand break (DSB) signaling heavily relies on these histone modifications, with signal amplification and the recruitment of specific DNA repair factors being dictated by them. Among the histones, H2A and its variants are central to this response, with phosphorylation of the variant H2A.X being the initial and most characteristic histone mark deposit upon DNA damage detection. Additional post-translational modifications of H2A and its variants contribute to the selective recruitment of DNA repair factors and influence the choice of DNA repair pathways. This review provides a summary of current knowledge regarding the roles of histone H2A post-translational modifications and variants in DSB signaling and repair, with a particular emphasis on modifications and variants that impact the choice of repair pathways. Additionally, the involvement of histone chaperones, chromatin modifiers, and remodelers in these processes is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Epigenetics and Epigenomics→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→