MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401792877 · doi:10.1080/15502287.2024.2391741

Dynamic homogenization of inhomogeneous elastic media based on energy equivalence

2024· article· en· W4401792877 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen Wang, Zhengwei Li, Xiaodong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHomogenization (climate)Equivalence (formal languages)MathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMaterials scienceStatistical physicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new method of dynamic homogenization of periodic elastic media under harmonic antiplane deformation based on energy equivalence. The dynamic homogenization is based on two main steps, (1) determining the dispersion relation and the detailed local response in a representative volume element (RVE) by analyzing the propagation of Bloch waves and (2) using energy equivalence between the periodic and effective media to determine the effective properties. The method is first applied to a one-dimensional periodic medium, from which the analytical solutions of the effective material properties are obtained. The results are compared with that from the original periodic medium and an excellent agreement is observed. The dynamic homogenization method is then applied to general two-dimensional periodic media to determine the effective properties and to predict wave fields under typical loading conditions. Illustrative examples are presented and compared with the results from the multiple scattering model. The method has also been applied to multiscale modeling of complicated inhomogeneous media containing multiple groups of periodic inhomogeneities. By treating each group as a homogeneous material with effective properties determined by the current homogenization method, the wave field is obtained using the boundary element method. The resulting wave fields from the current method show an excellent agreement with that from the multiple scattering model with matching local response details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and MechanicsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207