MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401798517 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad72f9

An hetero-modal deep learning framework for medical image synthesis applied to contrast and non-contrast MRI

2024· article· en· W4401798517 on OpenAlex
Daniel Gourdeau, Simon Duchesne, Louis Archambault

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContrast (vision)Modality (human–computer interaction)Artificial intelligenceModalitiesRepresentation (politics)Generator (circuit theory)Deep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some pathologies such as cancer and dementia require multiple imaging modalities to fully diagnose and assess the extent of the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging offers this kind of polyvalence, but examinations take time and can require contrast agent injection. The flexible synthesis of these imaging sequences based on the available ones for a given patient could help reduce scan times or circumvent the need for contrast agent injection. In this work, we propose a deep learning architecture that can perform the synthesis of all missing imaging sequences from any subset of available images. The network is trained adversarially, with the generator consisting of parallel 3D U-Net encoders and decoders that optimally combines their multi-resolution representations with a fusion operation learned by an attention network trained conjointly with the generator network. We compare our synthesis performance with 3D networks using other types of fusion and a comparable number of trainable parameters, such as the mean/variance fusion. In all synthesis scenarios except one, the synthesis performance of the network using attention-guided fusion was better than the other fusion schemes. We also inspect the encoded representations and the attention network outputs to gain insights into the synthesis process, and uncover desirable behaviors such as prioritization of specific modalities, flexible construction of the representation when important modalities are missing, and modalities being selected in regions where they carry sequence-specific information. This work suggests that a better construction of the latent representation space in hetero-modal networks can be achieved by using an attention network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it