An hetero-modal deep learning framework for medical image synthesis applied to contrast and non-contrast MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some pathologies such as cancer and dementia require multiple imaging modalities to fully diagnose and assess the extent of the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging offers this kind of polyvalence, but examinations take time and can require contrast agent injection. The flexible synthesis of these imaging sequences based on the available ones for a given patient could help reduce scan times or circumvent the need for contrast agent injection. In this work, we propose a deep learning architecture that can perform the synthesis of all missing imaging sequences from any subset of available images. The network is trained adversarially, with the generator consisting of parallel 3D U-Net encoders and decoders that optimally combines their multi-resolution representations with a fusion operation learned by an attention network trained conjointly with the generator network. We compare our synthesis performance with 3D networks using other types of fusion and a comparable number of trainable parameters, such as the mean/variance fusion. In all synthesis scenarios except one, the synthesis performance of the network using attention-guided fusion was better than the other fusion schemes. We also inspect the encoded representations and the attention network outputs to gain insights into the synthesis process, and uncover desirable behaviors such as prioritization of specific modalities, flexible construction of the representation when important modalities are missing, and modalities being selected in regions where they carry sequence-specific information. This work suggests that a better construction of the latent representation space in hetero-modal networks can be achieved by using an attention network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".