Preservation of probable MIS 7 deglacial and nonglacial deposits near the edge of the Hudson Bay Lowland in Manitoba, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stratigraphic principle of superposition assumes that sediments at surface are youngest. And yet, patches of older preserved landscapes continue to be identified in the regions formerly covered by the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Two gravel pits, at the edge of the western Hudson Bay Lowland near the geographic centre of the North American Ice Sheet Complex, reveal additional patches where older glacial and nonglacial sediment is preserved. These sites expose 1–4 m of a darker, highly overconsolidated, clayier till, and 0–2 m of a lighter, less consolidated, sandier till over glaciofluvial and post-glacial gravels and sands; the waning stages of deposition occurred at 214 ± 22 ka (1σ minimum age model quartz grain optical age estimates, n = 2). This was during the latter end of the cool Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 7-d (within 1σ range) or near the end of MIS-8 (within 2σ range). Next followed a warmer period similar to, or warmer than, present day with higher precipitation; inferred from pollen and macrofossils deposited in nonglacial low-energy floodplain or pond sediments. Our study highlights the need to accurately date Quaternary sediments, given that the shallowest nonglacial sediments at both gravel pits were deposited during an old (MIS 7) interglacial; there is likely no record of the youngest interglacial (MIS 5). Preservation of older sediment also means that in Quaternary stratigraphy, disjoint regional nonglacial “organic marker beds” should not automatically be considered correlative. Identification of similar “old” patches, together with till stratigraphy and composition, is essential to accurately model glacial sediment transport over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".