MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of several sludge dewatering conditioners on municipal sludge pyrolysis properties, kinetics, by-products, and environmental risk assessment

2024· article· en· W4401802243 on OpenAlexaff
Guiying Xu, Xiaoxuan Yang, Feihong Yu, Jiangnan Mei, Mingming Liu, Mingsong Li, Teng Zhu, Baizeng Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoal and Its By-products
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPyrolysisDewateringWaste managementConditionersSewage sludgeEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringSewage treatmentEngineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pyrolysis characteristics of four different types of conditioned sludge were ascertained, and PAM , CaO , K 2 FeO 4 , and K 2 FeO 4 -CaO-PAM (KCP) conditioners were employed as sludge dewatering conditioners. The sludge pyrolysis reaction's activation energy (E) dropped with the addition of four conditioners. CaO , PAM, KCP, and K 2 FeO 4 were the sequences of E needed for the pyrolysis of four different types of conditioned sludge. The addition of K 2 FeO 4 , CaO, and KCP resulted in an increase in the yields of H 2 and CO. Except for the K 2 FeO 4 conditioning sludge carbon, the pyrolytic carbon of the other three groups of samples showed an increase in S contents, while the pyrolytic carbon of the four groups of samples treated with conditioners clearly showed lower C and N contents compared to the raw sludge carbon. Protein-N made up the majority of N in sludge pyrolytic carbon. After adding conditioner, the level of organic sulfur decreased. Organic sulfur could then be broken down by K 2 FeO 4 and CaO. The four conditioners efficiently mitigated the ecological and environmental risks posed by heavy metals. Alkynes were the most abundant result in pyrolytic volatiles of sludge pyrolysis; the other products included acids, alcohols, lipids, furans, ketones, phenols , hydrocarbons, N-components, and so on. All samples' acids, alcohols, and ketones from pyrolysis were decreased once the conditioner was added. The acid reduction rate reached 66.7 %, and the alkynes clearly increased during the KCP conditioned sludge's pyrolysis. The sulfur level of the bio-oil was decreased by all four conditioners. Everything mentioned above indicated that the KCP aided in the subsequent pyrolysis of the sludge, leading to the production of an advantageous pyrolysis bio-oil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total EnvironmentSame topicCoal and Its By-productsFrench-language works237,207