MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401802587 · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116269

Dyke swarms of Onenhste and adjacent coronae in Parga Chasmata, SE of Atla Regio, Venus: Detailed mapping, swarm interactions and geological history

2024· article· en· W4401802587 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Ben Marzoug, Hafida El Bilali, Richard E. Ernst, Kenneth L. Buchan, J. W. Head, Naima Hannour

Bibliographic record

VenueIcarus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyRiftVenusMantle (geology)LithosphereMaficAmazonianRift zoneVolcanologySeismologyTectonicsGeophysicsGeochemistryVolcanoPhysicsAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parga Chasmata is a 10,000 km long rift system on Venus with abundant coronae (enigmatic circular tectonomagmatic features). In order to further investigate the rift-corona relationship, detailed 1:500,000 geological mapping was focused on Onenhste Corona and the surrounding region (16°-24° S, 145°-131° W). More than 46,000 extensional lineaments were mapped and grouped into 50 sets, comprising 17 radiating, 28 circumferential and 5 linear sets (interpreted to overlie mafic dyke swarms). Radiating and circumferential swarms are linked with Onenhste Corona (OC), Momu Coronae (MC), Ulgen-ekhe Coronae (UEC), Rzhanitsa Corona (RzC, centred just outside the study area) and 5 Unnamed Coronae (UC1–5), as well as Malibran Patera (MP) and Fedchenko Patera (FP). Linear swarms are provisionally linked with magmatic centres outside the study area. Crosscutting relationships between the graben sets (dyke swarms) were used to identify the relative ages of magmatic centres. We applied an additional approach to recognize coeval centres, the swinging or deflection of radiating and circumferential dyke swarms to reveal the stress interaction between different coeval centres. The relative ages (oldest to youngest) of the magmatic centres are UC2 > RzC > MC ≥ OC = UC1 = UEC ≥ MP > UC5, and FP > UC3. These new detailed data provide significant information on coronae timing, evolution and relation to rift zones that will serve as a basis for future quantitative studies of lithospheric and mantle evolution and the combined cause and effect of rifting and mantle diapiric upwelling. Several centres, RzC, UC2, MC, UC3 and FP, ordered from NW to SE, are aligned along a trend parallel to Parga Chasmata but offset about 900 km to the south from the main zone of rifting. It is inferred that this alignment is related to a zone of weakness associated with the rift extension. Along this trend the centres do not show an age progression. Coronae MC, OC, UC1 and UEC are aligned along the NNE trending P13 Linea, orthogonal to the main Parga Chasmata rift. The main centre, Onenhste, is coeval with UC1, which in turn is coeval with UEC. Additional age relationships indicate that the late stage of OC was active at the same time as MP, MC and the UC2–9 centre of UC2. Linea P13 is older than Chondi Chasma. This study, and continuing, detailed geological mapping and analysis are increasing our understanding of the relationships between the formation of the main WNW trending Parga Chasmata rift zone, the orthogonal trends of rifting and the numerous magmatic centres (mainly coronae) distributed along both trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIcarusSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207