MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401803968 · doi:10.1134/s102279542470056x

Study of a Polymorphic Variant of the TRPM8 Cold Receptor Gene (rs7593557) in 15 Populations of the Altai-Sayan Region and the Far East

2024· article· en· W4401803968 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. A. Gubina, Vladimir N. Babenko, E. Yu. Gubina

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneGeneticsEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract— The TRPM8 thermoreceptor gene (rs7593557) was analyzed in 15 population samples living in different regions of Northern Asia, the Altai-Sayan Highlands, and Canada. High frequencies of a rare genotype and allele in the populations of the Altai-Sayan region and Western Siberia were found among the Telengits (22.2 and 41.7% respectively) and were low among the Siberian Tatars (3.2 and 18.5% respectively), while among the peoples of northern Siberia and the Far East high frequency was found among the Nanais (22.2 and 42.6% respectively) and a low frequency among the Yakuts (1.1 and 10.9% respectively). No deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were found. Trans-association of TRPV1, TRPA1, and TRPM8 gene polymorphisms was carried out using the regression analysis method in 14 populations. Of all three pairs, only one, TRPV1/TRPM8, showed a positive correlation (0.55, df = 13, P-value, 0.032). In TRPV1/TRPA and TRPA1/TRPM8 pairs a negative correlation was revealed (–0.545, df = 13, P-value, 0.048) and (–0.46, df = 13, P-value, 0.097) respectively. Our data indicate that the studied polymorphisms of the TRPV1 and TRPM8 genes are correlated with each other and negatively correlated with TRPA. The results obtained may indicate the coevolution of these genes. It was previously shown that TRPV1, as well as TRPM8, was detected with high frequency in the Nanai population. It is likely that these two mutations came simultaneously from East Asia and spread throughout Russia, which explains the fact that they are positively correlated with each other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of GeneticsSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207