Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo investigativo explora as tensões contemporâneas na cidade de São Paulo, focando na relação entre resistência, experiência, integração e reflexão no contexto urbano. O objetivo foi destacar como a cidade, entendida como um campo de práticas cotidianas, interage com a paisagem ao seu redor. A pesquisa combinou teorias e observações de campo, analisando três áreas principais da capital paulista: o Parque Ibirapuera, o Largo do Arouche e a Vila Butantã, conhecida por construções de contêineres. A análise provocou discussões sobre o verdadeiro significado da cidade, especialmente quanto à resistência à diversidade em espaços públicos e privados. Essas resistências refletem as tensões urbanas, manifestadas por indivíduos e grupos que estabelecem suas territorialidades. O estudo questiona como essas dinâmicas influenciam o entendimento do que realmente é a cidade, diante das diversas formas de resistência que moldam o ambiente urbano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".