MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401806271 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3449241

Predictive Caching in Non-Stationary Environments: A Time Series Prediction and Survival Analysis Approach

2024· article· en· W4401806271 on OpenAlexafffund
Javane Rostampoor, Raviraj Adve, Ali Afana, Yahia Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTime seriesSeries (stratigraphy)Computer scienceSurvival analysisStatisticsMachine learningMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an innovative predictive caching strategy tailored to a real-world dataset, specifically the Facebook video dataset. Making caching decisions for the dataset is challenging due to its dynamic nature, where users’ content requests vary over time without fitting into any known models. Traditional caching strategies, which often rely on a constant pool of files, do not suit this dataset as content is requested by users, and then its popularity fades over time; furthermore, the list of available content changes. We propose a two-stage predictive caching strategy. Initially, it forecasts the number of user requests using content features and historical request data, achieved through training a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Then, we employ our proposed extended Cox proportional hazard (E-CPH) model to predict the survival probability of content. This facilitates proactive content caching. Caching new content is made possible by the timely eviction of content unlikely to be requested again. To incorporate the predicted content popularity and its life cycle into the caching decision, we introduce a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP)-based caching strategy. Here, the survival probability of content contributes to the belief state of the associated content which leads to our believed predicted reward - a cache hit. The caching algorithm then stores the files based on their predicted believed reward taking into account both the popularity and survival probability predictions. Simulation results validate the efficacy of our proposed predictive caching method in enhancing the cache hit rate compared to conventional recurrent neural network (RNN)-based caching and policy-based caching approaches, such as least frequently used caching and its variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207