MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401809591 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.20.24312311

Mandibular dose-volume predicts time-to-osteoradionecrosis in an actuarial normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model: External validation of right-censored clinico-dosimetric and competing risk application across international multi-institutional observational cohorts and online graphical user interface clinical support tool assessment

2024· preprint· en· W4401809591 on OpenAlexaff
Laia Humbert‐Vidan, Serageldin Kamel, Andrew Wentzel, Zaphanlene Kaffey, Moamen Abobakr Abdelaal, Kyle Spier, Natalie West, G. Elisabeta Marai, Guadalupe Canahuate, Xinhua Zhang, Melissa Chen, Kareem A. Wahid, Jillian Rigert, Seyedmohammadhossein Hosseinian, Andrew J. Schaefer, Kristy K. Brock, Mark S. Chambers, Adegbenga O. Otun, Ruth Aponte Wesson, Vinod Patel, Andrew Hope, Jack Phan, Adam S. Garden, Steven J. Frank, William H. Morrison, Michael T. Spiotto, David G. Rosenthal, Anna Lee, Renjie He, Mohamed A. Naser, Erin Watson, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Abdallah Mohamed, Vlad C. Sandulache, Lisanne V. van Dijk, Amy C. Moreno, Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Stephen Y. Lai, Clifton D. Fuller

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterZonMwNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Science FoundationCancer Research UKNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsOsteoradionecrosisMedicineCohortHead and neck cancerRadiation therapyLogistic regressionCohort studyObservational studyBrier scoreSurgeryNuclear medicineInternal medicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Existing studies on osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) have primarily used cross-sectional data, assessing risk factors at a single time point. Determining the time-to-event profile of ORNJ has important implications to monitor oral health in head and neck cancer (HNC) long-term survivors. Methods: Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data were retrospectively obtained for a clinical observational cohort of 1129 patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy (RT) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. ORNJ was diagnosed in 198 patients (18%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise variable selection identified significant predictors for ORNJ. These predictors were then used to train a Weibull Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model, which was externally validated using an independent cohort of 265 patients (92 ORNJ cases and 173 controls) treated at Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals. Findings: Our model identified that each unit increase in D25% is significantly associated with a 12% shorter time to ORNJ (Adjusted Time Ratio [ATR] 0·88, p<0·005); pre-RT dental extractions was associated to a 27% faster (ATR 0·73, p=0·13) onset of ORNJ; male patients experienced a 38% shorter time to ORNJ (ATR 0·62, p = 0·11). The model demonstrated strong internal calibration (integrated Brier score of 0·133, D-calibration p-value 0.998) and optimal discrimination at 72 months (Harrell's C-index of 0·72). The model also showed good generalization to the independent cohort, despite a slight drop in performance. Interpretation: This study is the first to demonstrate a direct relationship between radiation dose and the time to ORNJ onset, providing a novel characterization of the impact of delivered dose not only on the probability of a late effect (ORNJ), but the conditional risk during survivorship. Funding: This work was supported by various funding sources including NIH, NIDCR, NCI, NAPT, NASA, BCM, Affirmed Pharma, CRUK, KWF Dutch Cancer Society, NWO ZonMw, and the Apache Corporation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207