On a Transmuted Distribution Based on Log-Logistic and Ailamujia Hazard Functions with Application to Lifetime Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the past few decades, numerous distributions have been proposed in the literature to model lifetime data. In this paper, the two popular distributions, Log-Logistic and Ailamujia, were selected and combined to create a new distribution, namely the Log-Logistic Ailamujia distribution, to obtain a distribution that is flexible to fit data. First, its probability density and cumulative distribution functions are presented. Then, some distributional properties such as survival function, hazard function, weighted moments, order statistics, and entropy are investigated. Next, the parameters are estimated by the maximum likelihood method, and their performance is evaluated via a simulation study with varying parameter values and sample sizes. Finally, the proposed distribution is fitted to a real-life data set to examine its flexibility. The results indicate that the new distribution performs well. Furthermore, based on the three information criteria, the proposed distribution provides a more appropriate model than other candidate distributions in terms of goodness of fit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it