A portable and efficient dementia screening tool using eye tracking machine learning and virtual reality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dementia represents a significant global health challenge, with early screening during the preclinical stage being crucial for effective management. Traditional diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease, the most common form of dementia, are limited by cost and invasiveness. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to dementia, is currently identified through neuropsychological tests like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which are not suitable for large-scale screening. Eye-tracking technology, capturing and quantifying eye movements related to cognitive behavior, has emerged as a promising tool for cognitive assessment. Subtle changes in eye movements could serve as early indicators of MCI. However, the interpretation of eye-tracking data is challenging. This study introduced a dementia screening tool, VR Eye-tracking Cognitive Assessment (VECA), using eye-tracking technology, machine learning, and virtual reality (VR) to offer a non-invasive, efficient alternative capable of large-scale deployment. VECA was conducted with 201 participants from Shenzhen Baoan Chronic Hospital, utilizing eye-tracking data captured via VR headsets to predict MoCA scores and classify cognitive impairment across different educational backgrounds. The support vector regression model employed demonstrated a high correlation (0.9) with MoCA scores, significantly outperforming baseline models. Furthermore, it established optimal cut-off scores for identifying cognitive impairment with notable sensitivity (88.5%) and specificity (83%). This study underscores VECA's potential as a portable, efficient tool for early dementia screening, highlighting the benefits of integrating eye-tracking technology, machine learning, and VR in cognitive health assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".