MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401811565 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00672.2023

Menstrual and oral contraceptive pill cycles minimally influence vascular function and associated cellular regulation in premenopausal females

2024· article· en· W4401811565 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer S. Williams, Jem L. Cheng, Jenna C. Stone, Michael Kamal, Joshua M. Cherubini, Gianni Parise, Maureen J. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsBrachial arteryInternal medicineEndocrinologyLuteal phaseOral contraceptive pillMenstrual cycleMedicineEnosEstrogenArterial stiffnessEndothelial dysfunctionPulse wave velocityPopulationFollicular phaseHormoneNitric oxideNitric oxide synthaseBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comprehensive evaluation of the cardiovascular system in naturally cycling and second and third generation OCP users indicates no major influence of hormonal phases examined on endothelial function and smooth muscle function in the arteries of the upper and lower limbs, arterial stiffness, or underlying cellular mechanisms. Study findings challenge the historical exclusion of female participants due to potentially confounding hormonal cycles; researchers are encouraged to consider the hormonal environment in future study design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→