Oxidation and compositional modulation in single phase C14 Zr0.6Ti0.4Fe1Cr1 alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of heat treatment on the crystal structure and hydrogen absorption behavior of the AB 2 type metal hydride Zr 0.6 Ti 0.4 Fe 1 Cr1. The objective is to understand how 3- and 6-day heat treatments at 1000°C influence the alloy's microstructure and hydrogenation properties. Using electron microscopy, EBSD analysis, X-ray diffraction, and hydrogenation measurements, we found that the as-cast alloy exhibits rapid hydrogen absorption with significant compositional variations due to segregation during casting, confirmed by a single C14 Laves phase in XRD. Heat treatment slowed hydrogen absorption and reduced hydrogen capacity, with XRD indicating the structure remained primarily C14 Laves phase. However, SEM/EDS analysis showed substantial microstructural changes, including the emergence of new phases and segregation of Zr-rich phases, likely non-hydride forming, influenced by elevated oxygen content. These new phases probably contribute to the reduced hydrogen uptake capacity. • The crystal structure of Ti 0.4 Zr 0.6 Fe 1 Cr 1 AB 2 alloy was investigated in both as-cast and heat-treated states. • C 14 phase shows compositional variations due to limited elemental diffusivity during casting • As-cast alloy with concentration modulation shows rapid hydrogen uptake • Heat treatment at 1000°C retains Laves phase structure but causes phase decomposition and microstructure changes. • Elevated oxygen content influences new non-hydride phase formation, affecting capacity in heat-treated alloys
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".