MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401816103 · doi:10.14740/jmc4267

Conservative Treatment of Empyema Formation Following Intrathoracic Rib Fixation With Antibiotics and Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Dornase

2024· article· en· W4401816103 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aldin Malkoc, Lana Mamoun, Kendall Vignaroli, Harpreet Gill, Amira Barmanwalla, Alexander T Phan, Amanda Daoud, Alexandra Nguyen, Brandon Woodward

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma Management and Diagnosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmpyemaTissue plasminogen activatorAntibioticsSurgeryFixation (population genetics)MicrobiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rib plating is a recommended intervention for patients with multiple rib fractures or flail chest to improve shortness of breath, significantly reduce pain, and shorten the length of hospital stay. Here, we report a unique and extremely rare finding in a patient with empyema following intrathoracic rib fixation. A 32-year-old male with a history of alcohol use disorder presented to the emergency department trauma bay after a motor vehicle accident. Computed tomography (CT) showed right hemopneumothorax and fourth to ninth rib fractures with displacement. The right fifth and sixth ribs were then plated using a titanium RibFix bridge, implanted intrathoracically along the posterior surface of the ribs. On postoperative day 11, the patient developed an empyema and a CT-guided drainage catheter was placed into the collection. The patient was given a 3-day course of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase for the treatment of his empyema. On postoperative day 15, a repeat CT scan demonstrated significant improvement in the empyema with evidence of abscess resolution. Antibiotics were discontinued after a total of 7 days and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 20. This case report contributes information to the management of complications in intrathoracic rib fixation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicTrauma Management and DiagnosisFrench-language works237,207