Conservative Treatment of Empyema Formation Following Intrathoracic Rib Fixation With Antibiotics and Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Dornase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rib plating is a recommended intervention for patients with multiple rib fractures or flail chest to improve shortness of breath, significantly reduce pain, and shorten the length of hospital stay. Here, we report a unique and extremely rare finding in a patient with empyema following intrathoracic rib fixation. A 32-year-old male with a history of alcohol use disorder presented to the emergency department trauma bay after a motor vehicle accident. Computed tomography (CT) showed right hemopneumothorax and fourth to ninth rib fractures with displacement. The right fifth and sixth ribs were then plated using a titanium RibFix bridge, implanted intrathoracically along the posterior surface of the ribs. On postoperative day 11, the patient developed an empyema and a CT-guided drainage catheter was placed into the collection. The patient was given a 3-day course of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase for the treatment of his empyema. On postoperative day 15, a repeat CT scan demonstrated significant improvement in the empyema with evidence of abscess resolution. Antibiotics were discontinued after a total of 7 days and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 20. This case report contributes information to the management of complications in intrathoracic rib fixation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".