MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401819577 · doi:10.14740/jmc4293

Intraoperative Takotsubo Syndrome

2024· article· en· W4401819577 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gentian Huti, Filadelfo Coniglione, Alert Drishti, Mustafa Bajraktari, Alert Xhaja, Asead Abdyli, Krenar Lilaj, Diamant Lulaj, Rudin Domi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTakotsubo syndromeAnesthesiaInternal medicineCardiomyopathyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a rare condition that presents a diagnostic challenge due to its close resemblance to acute myocardial ischemia and other cardiac disorders. The excessive production of catecholamines triggers abnormal and severe changes in the myocardium, typically resulting in significant dyskinesia of the left ventricle's apex, reduced ejection fraction, hypotension, and pulmonary edema. Recent reports suggest that potential risk factors may include postmenopausal syndrome and intense, unexpected stress, whether related to life events or medical conditions. Complications such as heart failure, thrombosis, and severe arrhythmias are infrequent and more likely to occur in patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions. We present the case of a 22-year-old woman who developed intraoperative Takotsubo cardiomyopathy during a transsphenoidal resection of a prolactin-secreting pituitary tumor under general anesthesia. Perioperative combination of cabergoline and oxymetazoline induced intraoperative hypertension, pulmonary edema, and Takotsubo stress cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case in the literature of intraoperative Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, potentially linked to the specific combination of intraoperative cabergoline and oxymetazoline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207