Some aspects concerning the patients′ rehabilitation after total hip artroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose The objective of the article is to reports on the quality of rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty by measuring the parameters of joint mobility of the hip in abduction. extension and flexion, at 2, 4 and 6 weeks in which recovery exercises proposed by the physiotherapist were performed. Material and method Joint mobility was measured by active (AROM) and passive (PROM) range of motion during abduction, extension and flexion of hip joint using a digital dynamometer called "Active Force 2". For the assessment of patients health status from a functional point of view, the WOMAC index (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) was used. Results The experimental data acquired in the measurement of hip AROM and hip PROM during abduction, extension and flexion at 2, 4 and 6 weeks of exercises performed after total hip arthroplasty are presented. Conclusions The reported values can be used as indicators showing a better functional recovery of patients after total hip arthroplasty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".