Quantifying Forms and Functions of Enterohepatic Bile Acid Pools in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS & AIMS: Bile acids (BAs) are core gastrointestinal metabolites with dual functions in lipid absorption and cell signaling. BAs circulate between the liver and distal small intestine (i.e., ileum), yet the dynamics through which complex BA pools are absorbed in the ileum and interact with host intestinal cells in vivo remain poorly understood. Because ileal absorption is rate-limiting in determining which BAs in the intestinal lumen gain access to host intestinal cells and receptors, and at what concentrations, we hypothesized that defining the rates and routes of ileal BA absorption in vivo would yield novel insights into the physiological forms and functions of mouse enterohepatic BA pools. METHODS: Using ex vivo mass spectrometry, we quantified 88 BA species and metabolites in the intestinal lumen and superior mesenteric vein of individual wild-type mice, and cage-mates lacking the ileal BA transporter, Asbt/Slc10a2. RESULTS: Using these data, we calculated that the pool of BAs circulating through ileal tissue (i.e., the ileal BA pool) in fasting C57BL/6J female mice is ∼0.3 μmol/g. Asbt-mediated transport accounted for ∼80% of this pool and amplified size. Passive permeability explained the remaining ∼20% and generated diversity. Compared with wild-type mice, the ileal BA pool in Asbt-deficient mice was ∼5-fold smaller, enriched in secondary BA species and metabolites normally found in the colon, and elicited unique transcriptional responses on addition to exvivo-cultured ileal explants. CONCLUSIONS: This study defines quantitative traits of the mouse enterohepatic BA pool and reveals how aberrant BA metabolism can impinge directly on host intestinal physiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".