Fully integrated microneedle biosensor array for wearable multiplexed fitness biomarkers monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fitness monitoring has become increasingly important in modern lifestyles; the current fitness monitoring always relies on physical sensors, making it challenging to detect pertinent issues at a deeper level when exercising. Here, we report a fully integrated wearable microneedle sensor that simultaneously measures fitness related biomarkers (e.g., glucose, lactate, and alcohol) during physical exercise. Such a sensor integrates a biocompatible 3D-printed microneedle array that can comfortably access skin interstitial fluid and a small circuit for signal processing and calibration, and wireless communication. The microneedle array features good biocompatibility and highly sensitive biochemical sensors that can detect even the slightest variations within the biomarkers of this fluid. On-body experimental results indicate that such a sensor can monitor fitness-related biomarkers across multiple subjects and support multi-day monitoring, with results showing a good correlation with commercial devices. The data was transmitted to a smartphone via Bluetooth and uploaded to cloud platforms for further health assessment. This study has the potential to boost intelligent wearable devices in sports health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".