Enhancing subsurface seismic profiling with distributed acoustic sensing and optimization algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distribution of shear-wave velocities in the subsurface is generally used to assess the potential for seismic liquefaction and soil amplification effects and to classify seismic sites. Newly developed distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology enables estimation of the shear-wave distribution as a high-density seismic observation system. This technology is characterized by low maintenance costs, high-resolution outputs, and real-time data transmission capabilities, albeit with the challenge of managing massive data generation. Rapid and efficient interpretation of data is the key to advancing application of the DAS technology. In this study, field tests were carried out to record ambient noise over a short period using DAS technology, from which the surface-wave dispersion curves were extracted. In order to reduce the influence of directional effects on the results, an unsupervised clustering method is used to select appropriate clusters to extract the Green's function. A combination of a genetic algorithm and Monte Carlo (GA-MC) simulation is proposed to invert the subsurface velocity structure. The stratigraphic profiles obtained by the GA-MC method are in agreement with the borehole profiles. Compared to other methods, the proposed optimization method not only improves the solution quality but also reduces the solution time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".