Classification of Pneumonia via a Hybrid ZFNet-Quantum Neural Network Using a Chest X-ray Dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have made significant contributions to diagnosing pneumonia from chest X-ray imaging. However, certain aspects of diagnosis and planning can be further enhanced through the implementation of a quantum deep neural network (QDNN). Therefore, we introduced a technique that integrates neural networks with quantum algorithms named the ZFNet-quantum neural network for detecting pneumonia using 5863 X-ray scans with binary cases. METHODS: The hybrid model efficiently pre-processes complex and high-dimensional data by extracting significant features from the ZFNet model. These significant features are given to the quantum circuit algorithm and further embedded into a quantum device. The parameterized quantum circuit algorithm using qubits, superposition theorem, and entanglement phenomena generates 4 features from 4098 features extracted from images via a deep transfer learning model. Moreover, to validate the outcome measures of the proposed technique, we used various PennyLane quantum devices to detect pneumonia and normal control images. By using the Adam optimizer, which exploits an adaptive learning rate that is fixed to 10-6 and six layers of a quantum circuit composed of quantum gates, the proposed model achieves an accuracy of 96.5%, corresponding to 25 epochs. RESULTS: The integrated ZFNet-quantum learning network outperforms the deep transfer learning network in terms of testing accuracy, as the accuracy gained by the convolutional neural network (CNN) is 94%. Therefore, we use a hybrid classical-quantum model to detect pneumonia in which a variational quantum algorithm enhances the outcomes of a ZFNet transfer learning method. CONCLUSION: This approach is an efficient and automated method for detecting pneumonia and could significantly enhance outcome measures related to the speed and accuracy of the network in the clinical and healthcare sectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".