MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401843025 · doi:10.30743/cheds.v6i1.5354

OPTIMASI TEMPERATUR DAN KONSENTRASI NaOH PADA PEMBUATAN KARBOL DARI MINYAK JELANTAH

2022· article· id· W4401843025 on OpenAlexaff
Pratiwi Putri Lestari, Sukmawati Sukmawati

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEDS Journal of Chemistry Education and Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Products and Applications
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNuclear chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Karbol adalah cairan pembersih non-detergenik (tidak mengandung deterjen) dan desinfektan yang memiliki wangi tertentu. Pada proses pembuatan karbol dari minyak jelantah, digunakan metode pemanasan untuk pembuatannya. Adapun tahapan penelitian ini dimulai dari preparasi bahan pembuatan, penjernihan awal bahan pembuatan, analisa warna, analisa koefisien fenol, analisa pH, dan analisa stabilitas pada air sadah. Berdasarkan hasil analisa yang paling optimum didapat pada karbol minyak jelantah dengan pemasakan di temperatur 90 °C. Pada konsentrasi NaOH 10 % nilai yang didapat pH = 7, koefisien fenol = 2,22, warna = coklat, stabilitas emulsi pada air sadah = stabil. Pada konsentrasi NaOH 20 % nilai yang didapat pH = 9, koefisien fenol = 2,22, warna = coklat, stabilitas emulsi pada air sadah = stabil. Pada konsentrasi NaOH 30 % nilai yang didapat pH = 10, koefisien fenol = 2,77, warna = coklat, stabilitas emulsi pada air sadah = stabil. Pada konsentrasi NaOH 40 % nilai yang didapat pH = 11, koefisien fenol = 2,77, warna = coklat, stabilitas emulsi pada air sadah = stabil. Hasil yang diperoleh sesuai dengan BSN (SNI-06-1842-1995).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHEDS Journal of Chemistry Education and ScienceSame topicNatural Products and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207