MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401845280 · doi:10.1111/epi.18088

Oscillatory and nonoscillatory sleep electroencephalographic biomarkers of the epileptic network

2024· article· en· W4401845280 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Véronique Latreille, Justin Corbin‐Lapointe, Laure Peter‐Derex, John Thomas, Jean‐Marc Lina, Birgit Frauscher

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research - Antimicrobial Resistance Research InitiativeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
KeywordsIctalElectroencephalographyEpilepsyNeuroscienceEpilepsy surgeryPsychologyEpileptic seizureStereoelectroencephalographyWakefulnessAudiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: In addition to the oscillatory brain activity, the nonoscillatory (scale-free) components of the background electroencephalogram (EEG) may provide further information about the complexity of the underlying neuronal network. As epilepsy is considered a network disease, such scale-free metrics might help to delineate the epileptic network. Here, we performed an analysis of the sleep oscillatory (spindle, slow wave, and rhythmic spectral power) and nonoscillatory (H exponent) intracranial EEG using multiple interictal features to estimate whether and how they deviate from normalcy in 38 adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: To quantify intracranial EEG abnormalities within and outside the seizure onset areas, patients' values were adjusted based on normative maps derived from the open-access Montreal Neurological Institute open iEEG Atlas. In a subset of 29 patients who underwent resective surgery, we estimated the predictive value of these features to identify the epileptogenic zone in those with a good postsurgical outcome. RESULTS: We found that distinct sleep oscillatory and nonoscillatory metrics behave differently across the epileptic network, with the strongest differences observed for (1) a reduction in spindle activity (spindle rates and rhythmic sigma power in the 10-16 Hz band), (2) a higher rhythmic gamma power (30-80 Hz), and (3) a higher H exponent (steeper 1/f slope). As expected, epileptic spikes were also highest in the seizure onset areas. Furthermore, in surgical patients, the H exponent achieved the highest performance (balanced accuracy of .76) for classifying resected versus nonresected channels in good outcome patients. SIGNIFICANCE: This work suggests that nonoscillatory components of the intracranial EEG signal could serve as promising interictal sleep candidates of epileptogenicity in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Our findings further advance the understanding of epilepsy as a disease, whereby absence or loss of sleep physiology may provide information complementary to pathological epileptic processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207