MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401856276 · doi:10.3390/medicina60081351

Atypical Plasma Cell Leukemia Mistaken for Acute Leukemia: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4401856276 on OpenAlexaff
Irena Seili‐Bekafigo, Emina Torlakovic, Tajana Grenko Malnar, Marija Stanić, Željko Prka, Koviljka Matušan‐Ilijaš, Ita Hadžisejdić

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunophenotypingPathologyPlasma cell leukemiaLeukemiaMedicinePlasma cellPlasma cell neoplasmLymphomaAcute leukemiaImmunologyCancer researchFlow cytometryBone marrowPlasmacytoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The patient we present here had many clinical, morphological, and laboratory findings characteristic of acute leukemia. During the course of the disease, the diagnosis changed from acute leukemia to chronic small B-cell lymphoproliferative disease, a blastoid variant of mantle cell lymphoma, and finally to atypical plasma cell leukemia. Atypical plasma cell leukemia is a rare condition with aggressive biological behavior. Our patient relapsed a short time after achieving complete remission, in spite of aggressive therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. During relapse, it was possible to morphologically identify malignant cells as being of plasma cell origin, although immature and atypical. Atypical plasma cell leukemia presents a diagnostic challenge as it may mimic other neoplasms both morphologically and clinically. It is also recognized that plasma cell neoplasm immunophenotype may not be entirely specific for its lineage where common diagnostic biomarkers are applied by immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry. Where this is the case, only focused investigation for plasma cell lineage will be more informative. This patient has unusual clinical presentation, a nondescript morphology of the circulating plasma cells, as well as an immunophenotype, detected by the initial panels used for flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, that was not entirely specific for plasma cells. Such cases present a good reminder of the diagnostic complexity of atypical plasma cell leukemia and emphasize that plasma cell differentiation needs to be interrogated in cases where the initial work-up shows unusual results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinaSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207