Asynchronous Vertical Federated Learning for Kernelized AUC Maximization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) has garnered significant attention due to its applicability in multi-party collaborative learning and the increasing demand for privacy-preserving measures. Most existing VFL algorithms primarily focus on accuracy as the training model metric. However, the data we access is often imbalanced in the real world, making it difficult for models based on accuracy to correctly classify minority samples. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) serves as an effective metric to evaluate the performance of a model on imbalanced data. Therefore, optimizing AUC can enhance the model's ability to handle imbalanced data. Besides, computational resources within VFL systems are also imbalanced, which makes synchronous VFL algorithms are difficult to apply in the real world. To address the double imbalance issue, we propose Asynchronous Vertical Federated Kernelized AUC Maximization (AVFKAM). Specifically, AVFKAM asynchronously updates a kernel model based on triply stochastic gradients with respect to (w.r.t.) the pairwise loss and random feature approximation. To facilitate theoretical analysis, we transfer the asynchrony of model coefficients to the functional gradient through a dual relationship between coefficients and objective function. Furthermore, we demonstrate that AVFKAM converges to the optimal solution at a rate of O(1/t), where t represents the global iteration number, and discuss the security of the model. If t is denoted as the global iteration number, we provide that it converges to the optimal solution with the rate of O(1/t). Finally, experimental results on various benchmark datasets demonstrate that AVFKAM maintains high AUC performance and efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".