Peran Kepemimpinan Inovatif Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research adopts a qualitative approach, which is a research method that aims to observe research objects naturally and directly. In the context of this research, researchers act as the main instrument in collecting data and information related to the research object being investigated. The location of this research is SD Al-falah Cicalengka Bandung. The address is Jl. Captain Sangun No. 6 Rt. 01 Rw. 03, Tenjolaya, District. Cicalengka, Kab. Bandung Province West Java. The research instruments applied in this research are interviews and observations to find data and facts related to the role of innovative school principal leadership in improving the quality of education. At this stage, the principal of SD Al-Falah Cicalengka Bandung carries out several things, including: (1) Holding a meeting with all elements of the teaching staff at the school to formulate and determine the school's annual program which will be implemented at the beginning of the learning year. (2) Formulate all forms of facility needs required by the school based on each time period. (3) Holding a meeting at the beginning of the year regarding the implementation of the learning curriculum. In accordance with the statement of Bapa Syarif Hidayat, S.Pd.I as Principal of SD Al-falah Cicalengka Bandung "In terms of planning at school, I involve teachers in deliberations at the beginning of the year to discuss the school program for the next year."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".