MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Global role of vanadium for nitrogen fixation in extratropical forests

2024· preprint· en· W4401865707 on OpenAlexaff
Romain Darnajoux, Shannon J. Haynes, Marie Renaudin, Nicolas Magain, Sessina Dani, Spencer Koonin, Jolanta Miądlikowska, Yoshitaka Uchida, Takamitsu Ohigashi, Diane L. Haughland, François Lutzoni, Jean Philippe Bellenger, Xinning Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVanadium and Halogenation Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtratropical cycloneNitrogen fixationVanadiumNitrogenEnvironmental scienceAgroforestryClimatologyChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biological nitrogen fixation by nitrogenase is often assumed to rely exclusively on molybdenum as an enzymatic cofactor, despite molybdenum scarcity in terrestrial ecosystems and recent demonstrations of vanadium nitrogenase (V-Nase) activity in cryptogamic organisms, collectively responsible for over 40% of terrestrial biological nitrogen input. Here we highlight a global role for vanadium in nitrogen biogeochemistry in extratropical forests’ cryptogams. Measurements in bryophytes and cyanolichens from three continents indicate V-Nase activity in each forest surveyed. We use V-Nase regulation by molybdenum content and nitrogen fixation rates to estimate the global contribution of vanadium to nitrogen fixation by extratropical cryptogams as 30%, with human activities likely responsible for a 30% relative decrease since pre-industrial times. This newly discovered global role of vanadium forces a reevaluation of the nitrogen cycle, where including nitrogenase enzymatic heterogeneity will help better predict the response of the terrestrial carbon sink to global change and understand species biogeography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVanadium and Halogenation ChemistryFrench-language works237,207