MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predicting cardiovascular events in out-of-hospital patients presenting with atypical chest pain and complete left bundle branch block: role of CTA and echocardiographic Global Longitudinal Strain

2024· article· en· W4401866305 on OpenAlexaff
Guido Pastorini, Fabio Anastasio, Anna Botto, Valentina Tardivo, Mauro Feola

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geriatric Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsRegina General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChest painLeft bundle branch blockCardiologyInternal medicineStrain (injury)RadiologyBundle branch blockElectrocardiographyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<sec><strong>Background</strong> Out-of-hospital patients presenting with atypical chest pain and complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) have to be stratified for the presence of coronary artery disease and the risk of developing heart failure (HF). We investigated the prognostic role of coronary CT-angiography (CTA) and echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) in those patients in a mid-term follow-up. </sec><sec><strong>Methods</strong> Out-of-hospital patients with LBBB underwent echocardiography and a 64-slice CT angiography were evaluated retrospectively. Development of HF or a cardiovascular death were the events scheduled. </sec><sec><strong>Results</strong> Seventy-eight patients (32 female; mean age: 66.0 ± 10.4 years were enrolled. During a follow-up of 33 months (IQR: 17-77), one patient (1.5%) experienced a cardiovascular death, 14 patients (17.9%) required urgent outpatient visits due to acute decompensated HF (12 hospitalizations). Echocardiography showed a slightly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (50.0% ± 9.8%) and GLS within the normal range (-16.2% ± 4.1%). CTA analysis showed coronary stenosis &gt; 50% in 28 patients (35.9%). A high Agatston score (&gt; 100) was observed in 29.5%. Notably, 25 patients (32.1%) were diagnosed with left main coronary artery disease and 15 patients (16.7%) underwent revascularization during the follow up. Significant associations were observed between events and LVEF (<i>P</i> = 0.001), diastolic dysfunction grade ≥ 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.02), GLS (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), multiple coronary stenosis (<i>P</i> = 0.04) and Agatston score (<i>P</i> = 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed the relationships with LVEF (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), diastolic dysfunction (R<sup>2</sup> = 3.30, <i>P</i> = 0.04), GLS (R<sup>2</sup> = 1.43, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and Agatston score (R<sup>2</sup> = 1.01, <i>P</i> = 0.05). </sec><sec><strong>Conclusions</strong> In patients with complete LBBB, CTA and GLS identified those at a high risk of development HF. </sec>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geriatric CardiologySame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207