Molecular Absorption-Aware User Assignment, Spectrum, and Power Allocation in Dense THz Networks With Multi-Connectivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops a unified framework to maximize the network sum-rate in a multi-user, multi-BS downlink terahertz (THz) network by optimizing user associations, number and bandwidth of sub-bands in a THz transmission window (TW), bandwidth of leading and trailing edge-bands in a TW, sub-band assignment, and power allocations. The proposed framework incorporates multi-connectivity and captures the impact of molecular absorption coefficient variations in a TW, beam-squint, molecular absorption noise, and link blockages. To make the problem tractable, we first propose a convex approximation of the molecular absorption coefficient using curve fitting in a TW, determine the feasible bandwidths of the leading and trailing edge-bands, and then derive closed-form optimal solution for the number of sub-bands considering beam-squint constraints. We then decompose joint user associations, sub-band assignment, and power allocation problem into two sub-problems: 1) joint user association and sub-band assignment, and 2) power allocation. To solve the former problem, we analytically prove the unimodularity of the constraint matrix which enables us to relax the integer constraint without loss of optimality. To solve power allocation sub-problem, a fractional programming (FP)-based centralized solution as well as an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based light-weight distributed solution is proposed. The overall problem is then solved using alternating optimization until convergence. Complexity analysis of the algorithms and numerical convergence are presented. Numerical findings validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms and extract useful insights about the interplay of the density of base stations (BSs), Average order of multi-connectivity (AOM), molecular absorption, hardware impairment, imperfect CSI, and link blockages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".