Quantitative CT Imaging Features Associated with Stable PRISm using Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives The structural lung features that characterize individuals with preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) that remain stable overtime are unknown. The objective of this study was to use machine learning models with computed tomography (CT) imaging to classify stable PRISm from stable controls and stable COPD and identify discriminative features. Materials and Methods A total of 596 participants that did not transition between control, PRISm and COPD groups at baseline and 3-year follow-up were evaluated: n = 274 with normal lung function (stable control), n = 22 stable PRISm, and n = 300 stable COPD. Investigated features included: quantitative CT (QCT) features (n = 34), such as total lung volume (%TLC CT ) and percentage of ground glass and reticulation (%GG+Reticulation texture ), as well as Radiomic (n = 102) features, including varied intensity zone distribution grainy texture (GLDZM ZDV ). Logistic regression machine learning models were trained using various feature combinations (Base, Base+QCT, Base+Radiomic, Base+QCT+Radiomic). Model performances were evaluated using area under receiver operator curve (AUC) and comparisons between models were made using DeLong test; feature importance was ranked using Shapley Additive Explanations values. Results Machine learning models for all feature combinations achieved AUCs between 0.63–0.84 for stable PRISm vs. stable control, and 0.65–0.92 for stable PRISm vs. stable COPD classification. Models incorporating imaging features outperformed those trained solely on base features (p < 0.05). Compared to stable control and COPD, those with stable PRISm exhibited decreased %TLC CT and increased %GG+Reticulation texture and GLDZM ZDV . Conclusion These findings suggest that reduced lung volumes, and elevated high-density and ground glass/reticulation patterns on CT imaging are associated with stable PRISm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".