Lawsonite eclogite records subduction rheology and slab detachment, Faro, Yukon-Tanana Terrane, Yukon Territory, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lawsonite eclogites represent cold subduction in the rock record, and new localities provide rare natural field laboratories to investigate deep deformation processes. We present a new lawsonite eclogite locality near Faro, Yukon Territory, Canada, the first reported lawsonite eclogite locality of the Yukon-Tanana Terrane. The discovery indicates that mid- to Late Permian subduction in the Yukon-Tanana Terrane subducted cold material in an oceanic subduction zone, in contrast to most previous models. We define a pressure-temperature-deformation (P-T-d) pathway for the lawsonite eclogites using a combination of microstructures, mineral compositional mapping, crystal orientation mapping, and phase equilibrium modeling. Metamorphism in the Faro eclogites followed a clockwise pathway through the lawsonite eclogite facies, reaching peak pressures of 22–24 MPa at 525–550 °C. Rocks then exhumed to 14.5–16 MPa during heating to 630–655 °C. Crystallographic preferred orientations (CPOs) in omphacite developed dominantly by dissolution-precipitation creep and oriented grain growth concurrently with CPOs developed in glaucophane by a combination of dislocation- and dissolution-precipitation creep with oriented grain growth. We link this fabric and CPO development in omphacite and amphibole to lawsonite dehydration, slab decoupling, and initiation of exhumation of the eclogites, providing evidence that lawsonite dehydration plays a significant role in changes in subduction zone rheology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".