Resource Allocation in NOMA Networks: Convex Optimization and Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the joint power allocation and channel assignment (JPACA) problem in uplink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) networks, an essential consideration for enhancing the performance of wireless communication systems. We introduce a novel methodology that integrates convex optimization (CO) and machine learning (ML) techniques to optimize resource allocation efficiently and effectively. Initially, we develop a CO-based algorithm that employs an alternating optimization strategy to iteratively solve for channel and power allocation, ensuring quality of service (QoS) while maximizing the system’s sum-rate. To overcome the inherent challenges of real-time application due to computational complexity, we further propose a ML-based approach that utilizes a stacking ensemble model combining convolutional neural network (CNN), feed-forward neural network (FNN), and random forest (RF). This model is trained on a dataset generated via the CO algorithm to predict optimal resource allocation in real-time scenarios. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed methods not only reduce the computational load significantly but also maintain high system performance, closely approximating the results of more computationally intensive exhaustive search methods. The dual approach presented not only enhances computational efficiency but also aligns with the evolving demands of future wireless networks, marking a significant step towards intelligent and adaptive resource management in NOMA systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".