Geometrical Features Based-mmWave UAV Path Loss Prediction Using Machine Learning for 5G and Beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are envisioned to play a pivotal role in modern telecommunication and wireless sensor networks, offering unparalleled flexibility and mobility for communication and data collection in diverse environments. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the performance of supervised machine learning (ML) models for path loss (PL) prediction in UAV-assisted millimeter-wave (mmWave) radio networks. Leveraging a unique set of interpretable geometrical features, six distinct ML models–linear regression (LR), support vector regressor (SVR), K nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural network (DNN)–are rigorously evaluated using a massive dataset generated from extensive raytracing (RT) simulations in a typical urban environment. Our results demonstrate that the RF algorithm outperforms other models showcasing superior predictive performance for the test dataset with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.38 dB. The proposed ML models demonstrate superior accuracy compared to 3GPP and ITU-R models for mmWave radio networks. This study thoroughly investigates the adaptability of these models to unseen environments and examines the feasibility of training them with sparse datasets to improve accuracy. The reduction in computation time achieved by using ML models instead of extensive RT computations for sparse training datasets is evaluated, and an efficient algorithm for training such models is proposed. Additionally, the sensitivity of ML models to noisy input features is analyzed. We also assess the importance of geometrical features and the impact of sequentially increasing the number of these features on model performance. The results emphasize the significance of the proposed geometrical features and demonstrate the potential of ML models to provide computationally efficient and relatively accurate PL predictions in diverse urban environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".