MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ecologically Valid Tablet-based Cognitive Training: A Case Report of a Bilateral Thalamic Stroke Patient

2024· article· en· W4401879950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joana Câmara, Ana Rita Silva, Teresa Paulino, Sergi Bermúdez i Badia, Manuela Vilar, Eduardo Fermé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpatial Cognition and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionComputer scienceTraining (meteorology)Stroke (engine)Cognitive trainingArtificial intelligencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bilateral thalamic infarcts are associated with severe and long-term impairments, leading to a poor functional prognosis. As a result, patients can exhibit a wide range of cognitive and behavioral deficits, including difficulties with attention, learning and memory, language, emotional processing, time perception, and loss of self-activation, manifested through apathy and indifference. Information and Communication Technology-based Cognitive Training (ICT-based CT) with more ecologically valid content may be valuable in intervening with these patients. Beyond enhancing motivation and engagement, such technologies can be equipped with several features, such as cue systems and errorless learning techniques, that assist patients with severe declarative memory deficits by minimizing errors and engaging alternative non-declarative memory routes to facilitate encoding and retrieval of new information. Herein, we present a case report of LT, a 41-yearold female patient, with 10 years of formal education, diagnosed with bilateral thalamic stroke who enrolled in a one-month tablet-based CT intervention with the prototype version of the NeuroAIreh@b platform. Prior to the intervention, LT was submitted to a neuropsychological assessment to characterize her cognitive abilities, emotional state (i.e., presence and severity of depressive symptomatology), quality of life, and functional abilities. The tablet-based CT intervention encompassed eight 45-minute sessions and involved performing four types of Reh@Apps incorporating CT tasks (i.e., cancelation, categorization, action sequencing and calculation) within daily life scenarios (i.e., the kitchen and the supermarket). After the CT intervention, LT was reassessed and demonstrated reliable increases in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Digit Symbol-Coding, and the Phonemic Verbal Fluency test, suggesting improvements in global cognitive functioning, processing speed and phonemic verbal fluency, respectively. Moreover, quantitative improvements in both immediate and delayed recall trials of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test indicated a slight improvement in verbal episodic memory. Concerning the emotional status domain, LT also reported less depressive symptomatology. Throughout the rehabilitation program, LT became progressively more autonomous when performing tasks, requiring fewer cues and verbal instructions from the therapist, which enhanced her engagement, emotional stability, and self-efficacy. A three-month follow-up reassessment revealed that her cognitive and emotional status reverted to baseline values. This case report highlights the potential of a personalized tablet-based CT, not only to improve learning and compensate for memory deficits but also to foster self-efficacy and well-being in patients with severe acquired brain injuries and poor functional prognosis. Future studies should focus on optimizing patient outcomes by exploring extended ICT-based CT within a comprehensive and multicomponent rehabilitation program delivered in community settings. These programs can be implemented life-long and can incorporate both compensatory strategies training that capitalizes on implicit learning and memory, and psychosocial interventions for caregivers (e.g., emotional support, psychoeducation) to further increase the patient’s adherence and generalization of gains to everyday life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpatial Cognition and NavigationFrench-language works237,207