BIGFormer: A Graph Transformer With Local Structure Awareness for Diagnosis and Pathogenesis Identification of Alzheimer's Disease Using Imaging Genetic Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly inheritable neurological disorder, and brain imaging genetics (BIG) has become a rapidly advancing field for comprehensive understanding its pathogenesis. However, most of the existing approaches underestimate the complexity of the interactions among factors that cause AD. To take full appreciate of these complexity interactions, we propose BIGFormer, a graph Transformer with local structural awareness, for AD diagnosis and identification of pathogenic mechanisms. Specifically, the factors interaction graph is constructed with lesion brain regions and risk genes as nodes, where the connection between nodes intuitively represents the interaction between nodes. After that, a perception with local structure awareness is built to extract local structure around nodes, which is then injected into node representation. Then, the global reliance inference component assembles the local structure into higher-order structure, and multi-level interaction structures are jointly aggregated into a classification projection head for disease state prediction. Experimental results show that BIGFormer demonstrated superiority in four classification tasks on the AD neuroimaging initiative dataset and proved to identify biomarkers closely intimately related to AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".