Blockchain-Enhanced Zero Knowledge Proof-Based Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication for IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Authentication in low-latency Internet of Things (IoT) networks must satisfy three requirements, namely, high security and privacy preservation, high scalability, and low authentication time. These requirements arise because devices in IoT networks must operate in a secure and scalable manner despite being limited in computational resources. Existing authentication mechanisms focus on the security and privacy of IoT networks but neglect the importance of scalability and authentication time. Therefore, existing authentication mechanisms are unscalable and unsuited to low-latency IoT networks. With a focus on increasing scalability and reducing the authentication time while providing high security and privacy preservation in low-latency IoT networks, we propose a mutual authentication mechanism called Zero-Knowledge Proof-based Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication (Z-PMA) for IoT networks. The Z-PMA mechanism utilizes a combination of a zero-knowledge proof, an incentive mechanism, and a permissioned blockchain to provide secure, privacy-preserving, scalable, low-latency authentication for IoT networks. We develop a new approach to address the trade-off between the three requirements for authentication mechanisms for low-latency IoT networks that has the potential to improve the overall performance of these networks. A permissioned blockchain is incorporated in the approach to provide secure and immutable data storage using its distributed and unforgeable ledger. Our experimental results show that the Z-PMA mechanism reduces authentication time than existing state-of-the-art authentication mechanisms, while providing high security and privacy preservation as well as high scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".