MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single-Power-Supply Compatible Cryogenic In<sub>0.8</sub>Ga<sub>0.2</sub>As Quantum-well HEMTs with Record Combination of high-frequency and low-noise performance for quantum-computins applications

2024· article· en· W4401880210 on OpenAlexaff
Jeeyoung Yoo, Young-Sang Jeon, Seok‐Woo Son, I.-G. Lee, Hyeon-Bhin Jo, Seongmi Choi, M.-S. Yu, Won-Sang Park, H. J. Kim, H.-J. Lee, S.-P. Son, SK. Kim, Jeonghun Yun, Jae‐Phil Shim, Hongwoo Jang, Kitae Lee, Yongrok Jeong, Taegeon Kim, S. H. Shin, T.-W. Kim, Jae‐Hak Lee, K. Seo, Kyounghoon Yang, Dae‐Hyun Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryogenicsQuantumNoise (video)OptoelectronicsPower (physics)Materials scienceElectronic engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present$L_{g}=45$nm E-mode cryogenic In$0s\text{Ga}_{02}\text{As}$quantum-well (QW) HEMTs with the record combination of high-frequency and low-noise characteristics. The fabricated devices exhibited a true E-mode operation, the best balance between$f_{T}\simeq 662$GHz and$f_{mm}\simeq 65_{\sim}^{\gamma}$GHz, and the lowest$\sqrt{I_{D}}/\mathrm{g}_{\mathrm{m}}=0.176$at 4 K. Besides, we investigated the temperature-dependent behavior. Three-layer model indicated that the reduction of$\rho_{barrier}$was critical to lower$R_{s}$at 4 K. According to the delay time analysis, the improvement$\text{of}f_{T}$was mainly due to the mitigation of the extrinsic channel charging delay, arising from the enhanced carrier transport at 4 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207