MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Cryptocurrency Multiple Trading Strategy with Kalman Filter Innovation Volatility Interval Forecasts

2024· article· en· W4401881390 on OpenAlexafffund
You Liang, A. Thavaneswaran, Juan Liyau, Areebah Muhammad, Thimani Ranathungage, Ruppa K. Thulasiram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCryptocurrencyKalman filterVolatility (finance)Computer scienceEconometricsInterval (graph theory)EconomicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pairs trading and multiple trading strategies are types of market-neutral strategies to use a pair or a combination of stocks and other financial instruments with co-integration or co-movements to generate potential profits, which may not be affected by the direction of the overall market. Commonly used pairs and multiple trading strategies are constructed using the Kalman Filter (KF) to utilize mean reversion in nonstationary but co-integrated asset prices. In this paper, we propose novel resilient pairs trading and multiple trading strategies using the combination of the KF algorithm and the KF innovation volatility interval forecasts using neural networks. The proposed trading strategies are implemented and investigated using the hourly prices of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash in the bear market. Those crypto assets are selected because they move in the same direction in the long term and have high trading volumes. The experimental results reveal performance for the proposed trading strategies with the upper and lower trading intervals using KF innovation volatility interval forecasts superior to that of the trading strategies with upper and lower trading bands using KF innovation volatility point forecasts. The performance and robustness of the proposed trading strategies using a proper assumption of transaction costs have also been examined. The strategies using innovation volatility interval forecasts consistently generate higher profits and a more robust number of transactions with or without transaction costs than those using innovation volatility point forecasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies→French-language works237,207→