Medial Entorhinal VIP-expressing interneurons receive direct input from Anterior Dorsal Thalamus and are critical for spatial memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Head-direction (HD) cells are found across several regions in the brain, including the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus (ADN), the subicular complex, and the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC). A fundamental role of head direction cells is to provide input to MEC grid cells, which are thought to translate information about head direction into a metric code for spatial location. However, classic anatomical studies indicate that most thalamic HD projections pass indirectly to the MEC via the post- and para-subiculum, with only a small subset of ADN fibers terminating in the MEC. To further investigate the smaller and direct projection to the MEC, we use rabies-mediated retrograde tracing in mice to determine if this projection explicitly targets a subset of MEC neurons. Our findings reveal that ADN neurons specifically project onto MEC interneurons, with a preference for MEC VIP-expressing cells. Additionally, MEC VIP cells receive input from the hippocampus, the subicular complex, and the retrosplenial cortex - key centers for spatial memory - suggesting a specialized role for MEC VIP cells in spatial memory. Indeed, we find that MEC VIP cells exhibit increased c-Fos expression in a spatial memory task and show that chemogenetic inhibition of these neurons impairs task performance. Together, these data uncover a specific projection of head direction information onto MEC interneurons and confirm that MEC VIP-expressing cells are critical for spatial memory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".