MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LSB Removal in RNS with 2's Power Residue |𝑥|2 𝑚

2024· preprint· en· W4401883351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidue (chemistry)Least significant bitArithmeticChemistryComputer scienceMathematicsOperating systemOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient Least Significant Bits (LSB) removal (scaling by a power-of-2) solution in the Residue Number System (RNS) with 2's power residue |𝒙| 𝟐 𝒎 is proposed, which includes flooring, rounding, and ceiling. This LSB removal solution is similar to that in regular binary system, and even with lower latency. This LSB removal solution does not need sign detection and even/odd detection. It also does not alter the base, or the moduli set of the RNS. The only requirement for this solution is no even modulus in the moduli set of the RNS. This paper also describes three alternative algorithms to produce the 2's power residue |𝒙| 𝟐 𝒎. Alternative-3 is the best of three, with which all the operations associated with the 2's power residue |𝒙| 𝟐 𝒎 are efficient 2's power modulo operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it