MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401899025 · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad7457

An exponential reduction in training data sizes for machine learning derived entanglement witnesses

2024· article· en· W4401899025 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum entanglementReduction (mathematics)Data reductionTraining (meteorology)Exponential functionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsMathematical analysisGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose a support vector machine (SVM) based approach for generating an entanglement witness that requires exponentially less training data than previously proposed methods. SVMs generate hyperplanes represented by a weighted sum of expectation values of local observables whose coefficients are optimized to sum to a positive number for all separable states and a negative number for as many entangled states as possible near a specific target state. Previous SVM-based approaches for entanglement witness generation used large amounts of randomly generated separable states to perform training, a task with considerable computational overhead. Here, we propose a method for orienting the witness hyperplane using only the significantly smaller set of states consisting of the eigenstates of the generalized Pauli matrices and a set of entangled states near the target entangled states. With the orientation of the witness hyperplane set by the SVM, we tune the plane’s placement using a differential program that ensures perfect classification accuracy on a limited test set as well as maximal noise tolerance. For N qubits, the SVM portion of this approach requires only <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> training states, whereas an existing method needs <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We use this method to construct witnesses of 4 and 5 qubit GHZ states with coefficients agreeing with stabilizer formalism witnesses to within 3.7 percent and 1 percent, respectively. We also use the same training states to generate novel 4 and 5 qubit W state witnesses. Finally, we computationally verify these witnesses on small test sets and propose methods for further verification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it