Pamidronate for pain in adult chronic nonbacterial osteitis: protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chronic nonbacterial osteitis (CNO) is a rare auto-inflammatory bone disease affecting children and adults. Adult CNO is characterized by painful bone lesions, primarily of the anterior chest wall. There is no approved therapy for adult CNO. Current off-label treatments include intravenous bisphosphonates, which have been shown to alleviate pain through decreasing bone turnover. However, no adequately powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted. This double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT investigates the efficacy of intravenous pamidronate to decrease bone pain in adult CNO patients. Recruiting at the Dutch national referral center for CNO, adult patients with persistent bone pain despite non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or optionally other standard-of-care treatments are randomized to receive two courses of intravenous pamidronate (at 0 and 3 mo, 30 mg daily, on 3 consecutive d) or placebo. From 6 mo onwards, all patients receive open-label pamidronate for another two courses. The primary outcome is change in score for maximum pain from 0 to 6 mo. Secondary outcomes include change in quantitative intralesional bone turnover as measured on sodium-fluoride positron emission computed tomography ([18F]NaF-PET/CT), inflammation markers, shoulder function, general health, quality of life, fatigue, physical, and work activity. The pamidronate for pain in adult chronic nonbacterial osteitis trial addresses the need for evidence-based treatments in adult CNO. Results will directly impact daily clinical practice, either validating the use of intravenous pamidronate in CNO at the dose used in this trial or prompting the search for alternative regimens or agents. This trial was registered in EudraCT (reference 2020-001068-27) and the Dutch Trial Register (reference NL68020.058.20).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".