Regulation of folate transport at the mouse arachnoid barrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: vitamins essential for normal growth and development in the central nervous system (CNS). Transport of folates is mediated by three major transport proteins: folate receptor alpha (FRα), proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT), and reduced folate carrier (RFC). Brain folate uptake occurs at the choroid plexus (CP) epithelium through coordinated actions of FRα and PCFT, or directly into brain parenchyma at the vascular blood-brain barrier (BBB), mediated by RFC. Impaired folate transport can occur due to loss of function mutations in FRα or PCFT, resulting in suboptimal CSF folate levels. Our previous reports have demonstrated RFC upregulation by nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1) once activated by the natural compound pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ). More recently, we have identified folate transporter localization at the arachnoid barrier (AB). The purpose of the present study was to further characterize folate transporters localization and function in AB cells, as well as their regulation by NRF-1/PGC-1α signaling and folate deficiency. METHODS: In immortalized mouse AB cells, polarized localization of RFC and PCFT was assessed by immunocytochemical analysis, with RFC and PCFT functionality examined with transport assays. The effects of PQQ treatment on changes in RFC functional expression were also investigated. Mouse AB cells grown in folate-deficient conditions were assessed for changes in gene expression of the folate transporters, and other key transporters and tight junction proteins. RESULTS: Immunocytochemical analysis revealed apical localization of RFC at the mouse AB epithelium, with PCFT localized on the basolateral side and within intracellular compartments. PQQ led to significant increases in RFC functional expression, mediated by activation of the NRF-1/PGC-1α signalling cascade. Folate deficiency led to significant increases in expression of RFC, MRP3, P-gp, GLUT1 and the tight junction protein claudin-5. CONCLUSION: These results uncover the polarized expression of RFC and PCFT at the AB, with induction of RFC functional expression by activation of the NRF-1/PGC-1α signalling pathway and folate deficiency. These results suggest that the AB may contribute to the flow of folates into the CSF, representing an additional pathway when folate transport at the CP is impaired.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".