MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401917454 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570424

Analytical Modeling and Experimental Validation of Common Mode Impedance in a Low- Voltage DC Micro-Grid

2024· article· en· W4401917454 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Djelloul Bensaad, Abdechafik Hadjadj, Rabah Djekidel, Achour Ales

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical impedanceGridMode (computer interface)Low voltageModel validationVoltageComputer scienceMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, electrical networks contain more and more electrical devices interconnected by power, ground, and control cables, which are generally propagation paths of conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI).It is interesting to focus specifically on mode disturbances common.This paper proposes an effective method to recognize low voltage direct current micro-grids (LVDCMG), through common mode impedance identification.For this purpose, a direct current micro-grid (DCMG) can be modeled, it consisted from three converters connected in parallel, including the connectors; the model consists in calculating the common mode impedance of the DCMG.It should be noted that a good knowledge of impedance helps engineers to perform filter optimization, prognostic algorithms, and the protection of electrical installations.The analytical models have been tested by numerical simulation and validated by experimental measurements over a wide frequency range up to 30MHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207