MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401920821 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.244

Opioid Use Disorder in Three Samples of the Lebanese Population: Correlation with Clinical and Genetic Factors

2024· article· en· W4401920821 on OpenAlexaff
Kamal Chamoun, Fabienne Hajj Moussa Lteif, Pascale Salameh, Hala Sacre, Ramzi Haddad, L. Rabbaa, Bruno Mégarbane, Aline Hajj

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelationOpioid use disorderPsychologyOpioidPopulationClinical psychologyPsychiatryMedicineInternal medicineMathematicsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a severe and recurrent condition that contributes to a global prevalence of disabilities. Accumulating evidence suggests a potential convergence of clinical and genetic factors underlying OUD. Objectives This study explores the clinical and genetic factors associated with OUD in the Lebanese population. Methods A cross-sectional study in the Lebanese population included three different groups of participants stratified according to the cut-off of the revised Opioid Risk Tool (ORT-OUD): (1) Low-risk group for OUD (n=513; general population; ORT-OUD score <2.5); (2) High-risk group for OUD (n=87; general population; ORT-OUD score ≥3); (3) a third group consisting of patients clinically diagnosed with OUD according to the DSM-5 (n=46). The survey included sociodemographic information and used validated scales to assess other substance use disorders, sleep disturbances, depression, and anxiety. Genotyping for the COMT, MTHFR, and CRY2 genes was conducted for 91 patients using a real-time PCR (Roche®). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the associations between OUD risk and sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors. Results This study enrolled 646 participants. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations between risk of developing an OUD and cigarette smoking (B=0.583), worse insomnia scores (B=0.074) and Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test-alcohol (B=0.053) scores, male gender (B=13.351), lack of education (B=4.159), unemployment (B=7.235), low income (B=11.285), lack of healthcare coverage (B=4.190), neuropsychiatric disorders (B=7.966). Conversely, OUD risk was negatively correlated with the morning chronotype (B=-0.372). Bivariate analysis showed that the CRY2 AA genotype was significantly associated with a higher risk of OUD; nevertheless, none of the genetic factors remained significant in the multivariable model. Conclusions This study identified several sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors that could potentially increase the risk of developing OUD in the Lebanese population. Further research is needed to clarify risk factors and underlying mechanisms, enabling the development of more effective prevention strategies. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean PsychiatrySame topicOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFrench-language works237,207