MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401922053 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570428

Modeling and Application of Rain-Light Sensor in Automatic Clothes Drying Design

2024· article· fr· W4401922053 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mochamad Subchan Mauludin, Moh. Khairudin, Rustam Asnawi, Singgih Dwi Prasetyo, Noval Fattah Alfaiz, Zainal Arifin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingMeteorologyComputer scienceArchitectural engineeringEngineeringGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of science and technology has experienced such rapid growth, thus encouraging humans to try to overcome all problems that arise around them and ease the work around the environment through automatic control systems.One of the technologies currently being developed is the Arduino microcontroller.Based on the problems often experienced by students when leaving clothes to dry in the dormitory.If it rains or bad weather, it can be a problem if you do not have time to lift the clothesline so that dry clothes become wet with rainwater when there are no dorm residents because they are on campus.Given these problems, the author designed an automatic drying room prototype using a rain sensor and light sensor based on an Arduino microcontroller.The components used are a drying room and roof, a light sensor and water sensor as input, an Arduino microcontroller, breadboard and jumper cables, a power bank as a processor, and a servo motor and LED lights as output.A servo motor automatically moves the roof of the clothes' drying room, and the LED lights turn on, according to input from the light sensor and rain sensor, according to the conditions received by the sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207