MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401927503 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570414

Enhanced PD Controller for Speed Control of Electric Vehicle Based on Gorilla Troops Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4401927503 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bashra Kadhim Oleiwi, Layla H. Abood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGorillaController (irrigation)Electric vehicleComputer scienceElectronic speed controlControl theory (sociology)Control (management)AlgorithmAutomotive engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric vehicle (EV) technology is developing and requires effective and adaptive controllers to enhance performance and be the best sustainable solution to the population concerns caused by oil from other vehicles.This paper proposes a nonlinear Proportional Derivative (PD) controller to control motor speed in EV.The controller's optimal gains are tuned using Gorilla Troops Optimization (GTO).Two classical controllers (PID, PD) are compared with nonlinear PD controller, all tuned controller variables are determined using the GTO algorithm, and the Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE) fitness function is adopted to maintain the system performance.To simulate the system response, MATLAB (Platforms for m-file and Simulink) is used.The achieved results are compared with the classical controllers (PD &PID) to demonstrate the efficacy of the suggested nonlinear PD controller.The benefits of using the nonlinear hyperbolic function effect on system behavior can be seen in its quick settling time, which is 9.6% faster than the traditional PID controller and 47% faster than the traditional PD controller.It also became apparent in its stable response, which was free of noise and overshoot while the PID controller overshoots with a value of (8.8).While in rise time, the proposed controller with 0.0083s outperforms the PID controller 0.4905s, and the PD controller 0.1315s.According to the simulation results, the nonlinear PD controller settling time is faster and more smoothly (0.0187s) than the PID (0.18s) and PD (0.88s) controllers, which are also optimized with the same GTO tuning algorithm.The suggested controller and the intelligent tuning algorithm guided the system's response to produce the best outputs.The simulation results demonstrated a steady behavior and an effective response in tracking the intended speed value; transient analysis is utilized to explain the performance of the suggested controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicAdvanced Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207