Genome-wide association study of Verticillium longisporum resistance in Brassica genotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Verticillium stripe, caused by Verticillium longisporum , presents an emerging threat to Canadian canola ( Brassica napus ). Initially detected in Manitoba in 2014, the presence of this pathogen has since been confirmed across western Canada. Infections by V. longisporum can result in yield losses of up to 50%, which is a cause for concern given the susceptibility of most commercial Canadian canola cultivars. The objective of this study was to screen a collection of 211 Brassica genotypes for their reactions to V. longisporum , and to use genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for resistance. The plant material consisted of 110 rutabaga ( B. napus ssp. napobrassica ), 35 canola, 40 Brassica rapa , and 15 Brassica oleracea accessions or cultivars, alongside 11 hosts of the European Clubroot Differential (ECD) set. These materials were screened for resistance under greenhouse conditions and were genotyped using a 19K Brassica SNP array. Three general linear models (GLM), four mixed linear models (MLM), and three GWAS methods were employed to evaluate the markers. Eleven non-commercial Brassica accessions and 9 out of 35 commercial canola cultivars displayed a low normalized area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC norm. ). The non-commercial accessions could prove valuable as potential sources of resistance against V. longisporum . Forty-five SNP markers were identified to be significantly associated with V. longisporum resistance using single-SNP based GWAS analysis. In comparison, haplotype-based GWAS analyses identified 10 to 25 haplotype blocks to be significantly associated with V. longisporum resistance. Between 20% and 56% of QTLs identified by the more conventional single-SNP based GWAS analysis were also detected by the haplotype-based GWAS analysis. The overlapping genomic regions identified by the two GWAS methods present promising hotspots for marker-assisted selection in the future development of Verticillium stripe-resistant canola.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".